2017-18' Playoff Games

Standings update: Celtics wait for first round opponent
Boston is locked into the #2 seed, but is still waiting to find out who they’ll be facing in Round One.
By Chris Grenham

Winslow Townson-USA TODAY Sports


Heading into the final week of the regular season, the Boston Celtics find themselves in a peculiar position. Yes, they’re locked in to #2 in the East, but there’s a looming pessimism from throughout the league that seems to be putting a damper on Brad Stevens’ current roster. You wouldn’t know it from spending time inside the Celtics locker room though, as they seem to be using this doubt as motivation to prove everyone wrong.



So where do we currently stand, and who will be coming to Boston next weekend to kick off the post-season? Let’s discuss.



If the playoffs were to start today, the Celtics would be hosting the Milwaukee Bucks in Round One. The Bucks are currently tied in the record column with the Miami Heat, but sit in the seventh spot after the Heat swept the season series.

Miami finishes their regular season campaign with a game tonight in Oklahoma City, followed by a road matchup against the Toronto Raptors on Wednesday night. Milwaukee on the other hand welcomes in the lottery-bound Orlando Magic tonight, before heading to Philadelphia on Wednesday night. Toronto has clinched the #1 seed in the East, but are still playing for HCA vs. the Warriors if they were to meet in the Finals. The Sixers are still holding off the Cavaliers for #3. As you can see, the six and seven seeds are far from concrete.

Let’s not forget about the current 8-seed, and potentially the scariest opponent of the bottom three, the Washington Wizards. Washington sits one game back of Miami and Milwaukee. Washington will face the Celtics at Capital One Arena on Tuesday night, before wrapping up their season in Orlando on Wednesday. Despite four losses in a row, Washington represents a dangerous first round opponent. With John Wall recently returning from injury, they now have a fully healthy roster, something they haven’t had in months. If the Celtics want to avoid the Wizards, a win on Tuesday night would go a long way.


www.celticsblog.com/2018/4/9/17214122/standings-update-celtics-first-round-opponent-bucks-heat-wizards-boston-eastern-playoffs-nba

Tale of the Tape: Boston Celtics vs Milwaukee Bucks matchups preview
Boston and Milwaukee have changed considerably throughout the season
By Keith P Smith

Photo by Maddie Meyer/Getty Images


After 82 games, the 2018 NBA Playoffs are finally here. For the Boston Celtics it seemed like this day would never get here, as the list of walking wounded seem to grow by the day. But this Celtics team has adopted a “next man up” approach better than most and is now looking forward to a first round series against the Milwaukee Bucks.

Boston and Milwaukee have met four times this season, splitting the series 2-2. However, three of those matchups came in the season’s opening month, with the final matchup coming only a week or so ago. Both teams have changed considerably since then, both in terms of personnel and style.

In the early games this season, the Bucks were still coached by Jason Kidd and were still playing a frenetic, trapping style of defense. Today, Kidd has been replaced by Joe Prunty and Milwaukee plays a more traditional form of NBA defense.

In addition, Jabari Parker missed the first three early season matchups, while Eric Bledsoe was only part of the team for the second two games. As a matter of fact, current Celtic Greg Monroe played for Milwaukee against Boston the first two times these teams met!

On the Boston side, the changes are even more dramatic. Kyrie Irving excelled in three games against the Bucks, but he’s out for the season. Marcus Smart is unlikely to be available unless the series goes to a Game 7. Monroe is now wearing a different shade of green and suiting up for the Celtics.

With all that mind, it’s time to see just how these teams match up!


Starting Point Guards

Terry Rozier vs Eric Bledsoe

With Irving and Smart out, Rozier draws the starting nod for Boston. He broke out in a big way in this third season with 11.8 points per game on over 38 percent shooting from behind the arc. Rozier is also one of the best rebounding guards in the NBA with 4.7 rebounds per game, despite playing under 26 minutes per contest. And his defense remains potent at the point of attack, as he’s regularly drawn one of the opposing team’s best guards.

Against the Bucks, Rozier played in three games and averaged 8.7 points, 6.0 rebounds, 2.3 assists and 1.7 steals off the bench. He’ll be asked to carry heavy load in helping the Celtics to set their offense, while being the primary defender on Bledsoe.

Speaking of Bledsoe, he was acquired from the Phoenix Suns in early December and helped stabilize the point guard spot for the Bucks. He took over from Malcolm Brogdon, who transitioned to a bench role, which in turn helped boost Milwaukee’s bench. In 71 games (all starts) with the Bucks, Bledsoe averaged 17.8 points and 5.1 assists. He shot over 47 percent overall and hit 35 percent of his three-point shots. He’s no longer the bulldog defender he was earlier in his career, but has played better since Milwaukee switched to a more traditional style of defense.

Bledsoe was very good in two games against Boston this season, as he averaged 18.0 points and made 14-of-18 from the field, good for 78 percent. He’s adapted well to playing off the ball, as Giannis Antetokounmpo functions as Milwaukee’s primary ball handler. Bledsoe has also learned how to spot himself by limiting the reckless rim attacks that once defined his game. This has helped him largely stay healthy for two consecutive seasons for the first time in his career. With the “every other day” schedule in the playoffs, Bledsoe could be back on the attack, which will test not only Rozier, but Boston’s limited rim protection. These are two high-level athletes who love to get after it, which should be a joy to watch.

Advantage: Milwaukee. Bledsoe is a little more proven than Rozier, so that gives the Bucks a slight edge here. But it’s closer than it might seem, and if Rozier continues to play as he did down the stretch, this one could easily flip in Boston’s direction.


Starting Wings

Jaylen Brown and Jayson Tatum vs Khris Middleton and Tony Snell

At just 21 and 20 years of age respectively, Brown and Tatum are two of the youngest players in the NBA to have the playoff spotlight on them. Brown has shown huge growth from his rookie season, emerging as a true difference maker for the Celtics. Using Per 36 Minutes statistics, which is more reflective given all of Boston’s injuries, he scored 17.0 points per game, while hitting 46.5 percent from the floor and just under 40 percent from three. He also grabbed 5.8 rebounds a night and continued to play solid defense. The biggest quibble with Brown’s game is that he occasionally plays out of control on both ends, with reckless paint attacks on offense and sloppy closeouts on the other end. But Boston lives with that because his athleticism generally shows up in more positive ways.

Tatum on the other hand has come in to the NBA more poised than you could reasonably expect a 19 to 20 year old to be. He’s been a mainstay in the Celtics lineup all year long, playing and starting 80 games, missing only two late season games to rest. Again using Per 36 Minutes statistics, he averaged 16.4 points a night, while drilling 43.4 percent of his three-pointers. In addition, Tatum’s defense was far beyond anything anyone thought it would be. He was a big part in Boston having the league’s best defense.

Both Brown and Tatum were effective against the Bucks in the regular season. Brown averaged 14.8 points over the four contests and Tatum was just behind him with 14.3 of his own. They were also effective getting to the free throw line with a combined 40 attempts. With Irving sidelined, the Celtics will need that much and more from the youngsters.

On the other side, Milwaukee counters with veterans Middleton and Snell. Middleton remains one of the NBA’s most underrated players. Did you know he scored 20.2 point per game, while being the only Buck to start and play all 82 games? On top of the scoring, he snagged 5.2 rebounds and dished out 4.0 assists per night. If you want to nitpick, Middleton’s defense slipped this year, but that seems to be more a function of the crazy defense the Bucks played under Jason Kidd.

His running mate Snell didn’t fare as well this season. After breaking out as a “3&D” player last season, Snell dropped way off this year. He still made over 40 percent of his three-pointers, but took just 3.6 attempts a night. His defense fell off the cliff, as opponents attacked him on a regular basis. The fall off even cost him his starting role for a while midseason.

Middleton was strong versus the Celtics, as he scored 17.3 points over the four game set. He also performed well as a playmaker by leading the Bucks with 5.5 assists per game against Boston. One downside? Middleton shot way below his regular form, as he hit just 4-of-16 three-pointers vs the Celtics. Snell essentially played at his normal rate. He hit 5-of-7 triples against Boston, but did little else.

Advantage: Celtics. This one is also close, but Brown and Tatum have both been consistently good all season, whereas Milwaukee can count on just Middleton and has no idea if Snell will show up. If Boston is going to win this series, this is one spot where they have to advantage from game to game.


Starting Bigs

Al Horford and Aron Baynes vs Giannis Antetokounmpo and John Henson

Horford has been the Celtics linchpin this season. The consistent anchor of the defense and giving Boston versatile play on offense. Sure, you’d love more than the 12.9 points per game he scored, but he only took the fourth most shots per game on the squad, just ahead of Tatum and Rozier. Volume shooting and scoring has never been Horford’s game. All-around brilliance has been, and he delivered on that in spades. He handed out 4.7 assists per game, while also hitting 42.9 percent of his three-pointers. In many ways, he’s like a 6’10’’ point guard, as the Celtics offense asks him to handle a lot of the playmaking. And then there is the defense. Horford played at an All-Defense level and will garner some consideration in Defensive Player of the Year voting. And he’s going to have to show up in a big way against Antetokounmpo.

Horford’s unexpected tag team partner up front ended up being Aron Baynes. Baynes was slated for a backup role, but after Gordon Hayward went down, the Celtics shifted gears and went bigger than originally planned. Baynes delivered the best season of his career with 6.0 points and 5.3 rebounds per game, along with the rugged interior defense Boston lacked. Toward the end of the season, as injuries mounted, he even increased his offensive load and started the scoring the ball more.

Versus the Bucks in the regular season, Baynes was what he was all year. Horford however stepped up considerably. He averaged 18.8 points on 70 percent shooting from the field. He also made 6-of-10 from downtown, while grabbing 7.3 rebounds and dishing out 5.3 assists. Boston will need Baynes to do the dirty work inside, and Horford to be at his all-around best in this series.

As far as bigs go for Milwaukee, you might think it starts and ends with Antetokounmpo. Well…you’d be mostly right. The 23 year old launched himself into MVP consideration with a ridiculous stat-line of 26.9 points on just under 53 percent shooting, 10 rebounds, 4.8 assists, 1.5 steals and 1.4 blocks per game. He was often the “do everything” guy for the Bucks. On occasion he’d get a little turnover happy, but that is something you live with when Antetokounmpo is handling the ball as much as he does. Against the Celtics, he was even better, as he tallied 33.5 points on 54 percent shooting, 10.8 rebounds and 5.0 assists over the four game series.

Antetokounmpo’s running mate up front has been John Henson for most of the season. When Henson focuses on his rebounding and protecting the rim, he’s generally very good. When he tries to get involved on offense, it often has disastrous results. He was largely ineffective against Boston, but is playing a completely different role now than for most of the four game set.

Advantage: Milwaukee. Given the presence of Antetokounmpo, most would give the Bucks a big advantage here. But it’s a lot closer than it might seem. Horford has played well against Milwaukee this year and Baynes has been better than Henson this season. The Bucks still get the nod due to Antetokounmpo’s brilliance, but Boston is going to make him work for everything he gets.


Bench

Marcus Morris, Greg Monroe, Shane Larkin, Semi Ojeleye, Abdel Nader vs Jabari Parker, Malcolm Brogdon, Matthew Dellavedova, Tyler Zeller, Jason Terry, Shabazz Muhammad

The Celtics depth has been put to the test, as they are down to playing some of the backups to their backups. But each player knows his role and stays in it. Marcus Morris has emerged as one of Boston’s best scorers. He comes off the pine, but is often part of the closing lineup for each half. He scored 13.6 points per game, but has been even better down the stretch, as he regularly carried the Boston offense. Morris comes into each game ready to let it fly and doesn’t take long to get warmed up.

Former Buck Monroe joined the Celtics in February after being bought out by the Suns and has given Boston a stabilizing presence off the bench. He’s hitting 53 percent of his shots for 10.2 points per game with the Celtics, but has really flourished as a passer. He even had a triple-double late in the season. This helps Boston, because they can run all the same sets with Monroe in the games, as they can with Horford. The two don’t often play together, but when they do it tends to look like a passing clinic.

Larkin wasn’t expected to be much more than a third or fourth point guard. But like any good veteran, he stayed ready for when his number was called. Brad Stevens regularly uses Larkin when his team needs a jolt of energy. His speed and quickness on both ends has helped sparked several comebacks this year.

Ojeleye is the final Boston reserve who is likely to see meaningful minutes in this series. He’s played more than could have ever been expected this season due to all the injuries. His defense is generally good, as he can hold his own on players 2-5. But his offensive games is relegated to corner three-pointers, which often miss the mark. He’ll play between 10 and 15 minutes per game, mostly against other reserves and the Celtics will hope they just play even while he’s on the court. If Ojeleye struggles, his minutes will be replaced by fellow rookie Abdel Nader, who has been just as ineffective this season.

Milwaukee’s bench has been a mess all year, due to injuries and inconsistency. Parker is back and playing well, but he missed half the year while recovering from his second town ACL. Since returning, he’s doing his thing as a scorer, hitting for 12.6 points per game on over 48 percent from the field. Parker and Morris largely play similar roles for their respective teams, as forwards who come in ready to score the ball.

Brogdon shifted to a bench role after Milwaukee acquired Bledsoe, but then promptly got hurt. He’s recently returned and the Bucks hope he can help shore up a rocky backup guard group. He’ll play behind both Bledsoe and Snell and could be a part of Milwaukee’s closing lineup when he’s on.

Beyond Parker and Brogdon, it’s a bit of a grab bag of players for Joe Prunty. Some nights he goes to former Celtics Zeller and Terry, others he calls on Brown. Lately Dellavedova, who recently returned from injury, and Muhammad, who was signed late in the year, have gotten some run. It’s hard to know where the Bucks will turn from game to game.

Advantage: Boston. It isn’t that the Celtics are deeper than the Bucks in terms of players. But they are functionally deeper. Morris, Monroe, Larkin and Ojeleye all know their roles and what is expected of them. They regularly deliver quality minutes each night. The Bucks can generally rely on Parker and Brogdon, but the rest are major question marks. A ton of depth also isn’t needed in the playoffs, as rotations generally shrink to eight or nine players.


Coaching

Brad Stevens vs Joe Prunty

Here is where the Celtics single biggest advantage lies. Stevens has pulled every conceivable string this season for Boston. Because of injuries, the Celtics regularly feature players who weren’t expected to play any minutes, never mind key rotation roles for a playoff team. Stevens keeps the mindset of the team positive and doesn’t focus on the negatives or injuries. Each time Boston lost a player, the attitude has been “Back to work with the guys who are available” and it’s worked to the tune of 55 wins. Stevens regularly talks of playing to his players’ strengths and putting them in a position to succeed. Each guy knows his role and what is expected of him and that comes from the sideline. Stevens imbues his players with a confidence to make plays and it translates up and down the roster.

Prunty deserves credit for overhauling the Bucks defense after Jason Kidd was fired. He got away from the hyperactive trapping scheme Kidd had them playing and has the Bucks playing a more traditional scheme where they hedge and recover. Unfortunately, the offense remains relatively unimaginative. It’s a lot of “Get Giannis the ball and get out of his way”, especially late in games. Against good defensive teams, of which Boston is one of the best, this generally doesn’t work. In addition, the bench beyond Parker remains a work in progress. This isn’t Prunty’s fault, as injuries are the main culprit, but not having set roles on the eve of the playoffs isn’t where you want to be.

Advantage: Boston. This is where the Celtics can win this series. Stevens is one of the NBA’s best. And when he’s given time to prepare his team, they’ve generally responded with good results. The playoff schedule will also allow Stevens time to rest players, while also making adjustments from game to game. They’ll throw as many as five to six defenders at Antetokounmpo. They know they can’t stop him, but they’ll make him work, while focusing on taking away the rest of the offense. Boston has also shown the ability to make tremendous in-game adjustments, as they’ve won improbable game after improbable game. This is generally behind the coaching of Stevens, who implores his team to take it possession by possession and focus on the task at hand. This style is what gives the Celtics a massive advantage on the sidelines and may ultimately be the difference in who wins and who loses this series.



www.celticsblog.com/2018/4/12/17230898/tale-of-the-tape-boston-celtics-vs-milwaukee-bucks-2018-nba-playoffs

I'm expecting to see more Zone Defense and a bigger lineup utilizing Tatum at PG.

I like it...that would be crazy...start your engines!

Boston Celtics: Al Horford does it all in Game 1 Victory
by Joshua Bateman

Photo by Maddie Meyer/Getty Images


Al Horford delivered on all levels in a game one victory against the Milwaukee Bucks

The Boston Celtics just finished one of the most thrilling games of the season, and maintained they home court advantage against the Milwaukee Bucks. As they have been doing it all season long, the Celtics had to come through in the clutch, and close it out with a great overtime performance.

Terry Rozier hit the big shot, with a step back move that gave him more space than anyone needed. That was after Marcus Morris made game changing plays on both ends in the closing minutes.

Khris Middleton made sure to keep it as close as possible, but the Celtics made sure they did just enough to secure that victory. The Celtics collectively played great at times, with every player needed stepping up at important moments.

Al Horford, however, was the one player who set the tone on both ends, and made sure absolutely everything had to be done. Giannis Antetokounmpo and Middleton put up great numbers, but Horford made sure it was never easy, and disrupted then any time he needed to.

Horford stuffed the stats sheet in a way that we are accustomed to seeing from him, with 12 rebounds four assists, two steals, three blocks, and 24 points on just eight shots. Horford made every right decision, got all his teammates involved, and made sure to hit every shot he needed.

He hit the free throws he needed to at the end, bringing the all around two way impact that makes him worth every penny of that max contract. It is not a coincidence that so many of the young players were ale to get comfortable, because Horford facilitated things on both ends, and made everything easier on all those around him.

The Celtics have proven they have enough shooters, and they do not need any one player to be hitting 30 points on a nightly basis for their offense to be good. They still have five or six players they can trust to hit their open shots, and get into double digit scoring.

Horford understands how this team needs to function as well as anyone, and Brad Stevens is able to use one of the most unique skill sets in the NBA to open everything up for these secondary players that still need some help.

It was a streaky game on both ends, but we should expect that the rest of the way. Neither of these teams have the consistent shooters that will allow them to sustain their best for a full game. The Celtics staggered good defensive quarters, and almost blew it by giving up 33 points in the fourth quarter.

What mattered most was the Celtics always made sure that it was within reach, and they could play the way the wanted too. Horford made sure to get the offense going when it looked like the Bucks might start pulling away, and he was always there to make sure the Bucks could not get anything easy on offense, no matter what the situation.

The Celtics knew that Horford would have to be special to win anything in the playoffs, and he delivered in game one. Horford will always make sure to adapt what he is doing according to whatever the team needs, and if he is able to execute and get the players around him to execute the way he did on both ends, the Celtics should be able to get out of the first round.


hardwoodhoudini.com/2018/04/15/boston-celtics-al-horford-does-it-all-in-game-1-victory/


 
Boston Celtics vs Milwaukee Bucks: The Battle of Length
by Joshua Bateman

Photo by Stacy Revere/Getty Images


Length is going to be a major factor in the playoffs for the Boston Celtics

The Boston Celtics ended up with the best path to the Finals in the East, but that does not mean it is going to be easy at any point. They know they are capable of beating the Milwaukee Bucks, and can be confident in their ability to find an advantage.

One of the most interesting parts of this Celtics Bucks matchup, and an area where both teams will need to get an advantage, is with their length. These two have embraced versatility and position less basketball as much as anyone in the league, and length is a key at every single position.

When you look at the rosters, the Bucks certainly have more length. Giannis Antetokounmpo is a physical specimen we have never seen before, along with Khris Middleton, Jabari Parker, Thon Maker and even Tony Snell, who are all above 6’8 with wingspans that make them look longer.

There really is not a team in the NBA that can put that kind of length on the court, and it is a part of how they want to win. The difference for the Celtics, however, who do not have as much length, is that they can be more effective with their length.

Brad Stevens knows how to use that length as an advantage on both ends, and bring together the kind of lineups that they can dominate with. While neither of these teams have much traditional size, the Celtics are a strong rebounding team, while the Bucks are terrible.

The Bucsa are dead last in rebounding, while the Celtics rank 7th, averaging around five more rebounds per game. Rebounding is always one of the biggest questions when it comes to versatility, because the traditional bigs are the ones that dominate on the boards, and spend more time in the paint.

Rebounding is a great example of how Stevens is so much better at using the length on the Celtics, because they have Al Horford, who is constantly criticized for his lack of rebounding, leading the way on a top rebounding team in the league.

Length all over the court, with supreme athletes like Terry Rozier, Jaylen Brown and Jayson Tatum is how the Celtics can dominate the boards, without as much traditional size, and that is not something the Bucks have figured out how to do with their length yet.

One area the Bucks are extremely effective as using their length in is generating steals. The Bucks are incredibly active, and make it difficult for teams to find the passing lanes. Surprisingly, the Celtics have a much more effective defense, but are not even close with regards to steals.

The Celtics depend on ball movement as much as anyone on offense, and even if the Bucks do not have a strong defense, they have the length to disrupt what will probably be a very streaky shooting team.

The Celtics, on the other hand, need to close the gap when it comes to steals. Both of these teams need all the easy baskets they can get, and will be deadly in transition. The Celtics have proven they can play defense without the steals, but getting those easy points in transition will be much more important, especially if the Bucks continue to have success generating their steals.

The same can be said for blocks, which further confuses how the Celtics are so much better on defense. The Celtics do not get the blocks or steals they want from their length, but they are able to contest in a way that the Bucks cannot.

The Bucks certainly have ways they are able to use their length, but it has not helped them on the boards, and all the blocks and steals look nice until you see their overall defense is middle of the pack.

Stevens has proven throughout this entire season, that he might be the best coach in the NBA at using length to make up for any potential size problems. They can dominate on defense while having three point shooters at every position because of that length, and that alone is much more impressive than anything the Bucks do.

Keep in mind, the Celtics have all this length and avoid all the size problems, while being the second best three point shooting team in the league. The Bucks may show off their length more, but their defense is still not right, and they have not found enough shooters to even crack the top 20 in three point percentage.


hardwoodhoudini.com/2018/04/14/boston-celtics-vs-milwaukee-bucks-the-battle-of-length/

The old sayin.. ''Watch out for what you wish for''

Up early Elvis. I can't sleep past 5AM here.

The team with some decent bigs will win out over the jump shooters in the end.

History always repeats itself .

Bet there are roosters in your neighborhood as well...

Shamrock Notes: Jayson Tatum and the Sixers’ math problem
The Celtics have the personnel to make the Sixers one-dimensional.
By Alex Kungu

Winslow Townson-USA TODAY Sports


This team.

The Celtics resilience reared its head again with an impressive 117-101 win against the anointed Philadelphia Sixers. The game had its fill of physicality, chippiness, but also young stars just making big-time plays on both sides. Without Jaylen Brown, this felt like the Sixers were being handed the perfect opportunity to steal home-court from Boston and turn this series into what many felt would be the end of the road for a stingy Celtics team. But the Celtics had other plans, and a big part of that was rookie sensation Jayson Tatum.

The final stat line for Tatum was 28 points, 3 rebounds, and 2 assists on 50% shooting from the field. The athleticism difference between him and some of the Sixers perimeter guys was immense, and he responded correctly by bull-rushing the rim and earning himself 12 FTA. Via NBA Stats, Tatum spent 53% of his possessions defended by J.J. Redick or Marco Belinelli and was able to turn that into 16 of his 28 points.

  

With Jaylen Brown potentially coming back by Game 2, the Sixers are going to have a lot of decisions to make. Guys like Belinelli, Redick, and Ersan Ilyasova are staples of the Sixers identity. However, Boston has a team that is built to exploit some of their defensive shortcomings. It’ll be interesting to see how Philadelphia responds.


The Math Problem

Boston has decided to make a calculated risk. They’ll allow Simmons and Embiid to be defended one-on-one, in return, they will not give up threes. The results? The Sixers shot 5 for 26 from beyond the arc. If you’re a Sixers fan, you’ll point to the fact that you were 5 of 24 on open or wide open shots and that’s probably not going to be a trend that continues throughout the series. If you’re a Celtics fan, the overall attempts are what makes you happy. The Sixers shot nearly five less threes than they averaged in the playoffs and about three less than they averaged in the regular season.

Despite the Sixers’ game plan of overwhelming teams with a barrage of long-distance bombs, they shot just under 37% over the year and are in a similar spot during the playoffs shooting only 36.3% before last nights game. That’s an indicator that despite the team’s high attempts, they are susceptible to streaky performances like in Game 1. That becomes even more clear when you dig into some of the Sixers’ top three-point shooters.

Including this year, J.J. Redick has averaged 34.7% on three-point attempts during his last three playoff runs. During this years stretch, he has shot 41.2% on his catch and shoots opportunities, (which have been his primary diet from beyond the arc), but he’s shooting a mere 10% on pull-up opportunities. The dip also exists when Redick goes within the arc where his percentage drops from 66.7% to 45.5% when he goes from catch and shoots to having to put the ball on the floor. Another thing to watch for Redick is that he only has .8 attempts tracked that are not open or wide open which suggests that he’s not a player who will shoot when he has defenders around him.

Robert Covington has been a streaky all year as well, and in the playoffs, he’s only shooting 32.1% on threes on 4.7 attempts which includes shooting a putrid 27% on open and wide open looks via NBA Stats.

Marco Belinelli is a similar type of shooter to Reddick who prefers to shoot off the move on catch and shoot looks, but if you lower the quality of the looks, he almost becomes unplayable when you weight his defensive shortcomings. During the post season, he shoots 50% on open looks, but when those looks turn tight, his percentages drop to 22.2%.

lyasova, another critical signing for Philadelphia has mostly been a mediocre, low-attempt three-point shooter. In this post season, he hs only averaged three attempts and is shooting 31.6%.



The game plan for the Celtics to go all out on not allowing these guys to get clean looks makes sense. Philadelphia shooters can be good, but they’re all situational shooters that struggle when you take them out of their desired shot profile. The Celtics were the best team in the league last year at defending the 3 point line holding teams to 33.7% shooting. One thing that begins to happen when teams defend the line so well is that it creates an omnipresence for shooters that makes them rush their shots even when the looks are clean. That was a common theme for Philadelphia throughout the second half and one that the Celtics hope to carry over for the entirety of the series.


www.celticsblog.com/2018/5/1/17308030/shamrock-notes-boston-celtics-jayson-tatum-and-the-philadelphia-76ers-math-problem-offense-defense